Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Josh Hamilton's Unique Public Statement On His Addiction

Big 12 All Decade Team

In the first full calendar decade of the Big 12 conference, one thing was apparent: there were two schools that produced a good majority of the talent.  And while the best individual players may not have come from Kansas or Texas, a look at the Big12Hoops.com All Decade team reveals that a majority were either Jayhawks or Longhorns.

Don't see your favorite?  The Honorable Mention list is after The Jump

First Team All Big 12


PG – Jamaal Tinsley, Iowa St
SG – Tony Allen, Oklahoma St
SF – Kevin Durant, Texas
PF – Blake Griffin, Oklahoma
C – Cole Aldrich, Kansas

Second Team All Big 12


PG – Kirk Hinrich, Kansas
SG – Acie Law, Texas A&M
SF – Michael Beasely, Kansas St
PF – Marcus Fizer, Iowa St
C – Chris Mihm, Texas

Third Team All Big 12


PG – TJ Ford, Texas
SG – Andre Emmett, Texas Tech
SF – PJ Tucker, Texas
PF – Drew Gooden, Kansas
C – Nick Collison, Kansas

[UPDATE: Lots of good suggestions and opinions in the comments section.  Lemme give a little insight into how I compiled this list. 

I started with a list of Big 12 Players of the Year.  My rationale was that if someone was good enough to be the best in the league, even for one year, he warranted entry into this exclusive club. 9 of the 10 Big 12 Players of the Year made the top three teams.  The only one who didn’t was Wayne Simien, and that is because he played a PF position that, if you look at the past decade, was just STACKED.  Blake Griffin, Marcus Fizer, Drew Gooden.  Really you could put Simien in there, but who gets bumped off?

As for PG, Tinsley over TJ Ford and Kirk Hinirich has also garnered a lot of attention.  Tinsley’s place as the 2000-01 POY got him on the first team.  But you really cant go wrong with any of them.

Lastly, there is this question on what to do with Durant and Beasley.  Each only played one year, but they dominated the league (and the country).  Durant was a Naismith winner as the best player in the country and Beasley was a finalist for the award.  Both were league POYs. Because they didn’t play a full 4 years, they didn’t accumulate career stats that some others players did, but my list was based on selecting the best players, during their time in the Big 12, at each position.]

Star-divide

All Big 12 - Honorable Mention

Baylor Bears
LaceDarius Dunn
Lawrence Roberts

Colorado Buffaloes
Reggie Roby
David Harrison

Iowa St Cyclones
Craig Brackins

Kansas Jayhawks
Wayne Simien
Aaron Miles

Kansas St. Wildcats
Cartier Martin

Missouri Tigers
DeMarre Carroll
Clarence Gilbert
Arthur Johnson
Kareem Rush

Nebraska Cornhuskers
Aleks Maric

Oklahoma Sooners
Taj Gray
Hollis Price

Oklahoma St Cowboys
Byron Eaton
Joey Graham

Texas Longhorns
DJ Augustine
LaMarcus Aldridge

Texas Tech Red Raiders
Jarrius Jackson

Texas A&M Aggies
Bernard King

Comment 37 comments  |  Add comment  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Divisional Teams

Who would comprise starting 5’s for a game between 2000s North and 2000s South?

by TomBruno23 on Dec 14, 2009 10:29 AM CST reply actions  

At first I was a little surprised/disapointed with Beasley not making 1st team, but you can't argue with Durant/Griffin can you?

In all honesty I may have given Beasley the nod over Griffin due to the fact that Durant and Beasley were the two best players in the NCAA as freshman. It took an additional year for Griffin to be as dominant.

Actually, I probably wouldn’t have gone with the traditional PG-SG-SF-PF-C lineup because there is no way in hell Cole Aldrich is on the same level as those three. I’ll take a lineup with Beaz/Durant/Griffin over any front court rotation in any conference period.

Introducing the new 2008 Big 12 Football Champions: OU, UT*, TT*, and MU*!
Now Introducing the new 2009 Big 12 Baseball Tournament Champions: UT, KSU*, BU*, and MU*!

by mystman995 on Dec 14, 2009 10:46 AM CST reply actions  

Beaz/Durant/Griffin

that front court wouldn’t lose a game… you’re right.

If I were to have gone G/G/F/F/F that would have probably been the line up.

Shouldn’t Blake get credit for playing two years? or get dinged?

by Evan Pfaff on Dec 14, 2009 11:02 AM CST up reply actions  

It's a good point

But he still left early. I only give "credit’ to players who play all 4 years. But that’s a whole different topic….

But my main point (because I can’t really argue with Blake being 1st team) – which was I don’t believe Cole Aldrich should be considered as 1st team material. He’s a great player and will probably have a little success in the NBA, but he’s not a complete game changer like the other 3. Those three alone changed the college basketball landscape for three consecutive years.

Introducing the new 2008 Big 12 Football Champions: OU, UT*, TT*, and MU*!
Now Introducing the new 2009 Big 12 Baseball Tournament Champions: UT, KSU*, BU*, and MU*!

by mystman995 on Dec 14, 2009 11:37 AM CST up reply actions  

It was a difficult choice. I should have gone GGFFF. Had I done so Bealsey would be on the 1st team. He was so good!

by Evan Pfaff on Dec 14, 2009 11:50 AM CST up reply actions  

dumb list

Jamal Tinsley does not warrant being on the Big 12 all-decade team over Kirk Hinrich. Tinsley had one great season (thanks to Marcus Fizer who was unstoppable in the paint) and earned Big 12 player of the year honors as a Senior. That is impressive. But i’d rather have a pg with more assists who steps up when the pressure is on. Hinrich helped carry KU to two consecutive Final Fours and even earned his Regions Outstanding Player Award. Tinsley and his #2 ranked Cyclones famously flamed out against 15th seeded Hampton in the decade’s most stunning tournament upset. Add in the fact that he played only 2 seasons compared to Hinrich’s 4 and there is no question who the superior pg was for the decade. If you still have your doubts ask yourself this- Would you rather have 2 years of Tinsley or 4 years of Hinrich as your team leader and point guard?

by drussell420 on Dec 14, 2009 11:15 AM CST reply actions  

First Tinsley vs Hinrich

For their careers:
Tinsley averaged more assist per game
Tinsley averaged more steals per game
Tinsley averaged more rebounds per game
Tinsley (barely) averaged more points per game
Tinsley averaged more blocks per game

Since those stats are kinda watered down because Hinrich’s numbers are watered down because he didn’t get as much PT in his first year, let’s just look at their last two years.

Over their last two years:
Hinrich averaged more pts
Tinsley averaged more assists
Tinsley averaged more rebounds
Tinsley averaged more blocks
Tinsley averaged more steals
Hinrich shot better from the field, free throw line, 3 pt

I think that if you put either at the point you have a solid squad. The weight factor I used was that Tinsley was Big 12 player of the year his Sr year and 2nd team AA. Hinrich made it to 1st Team All Big 12 his senior year, but his teammate Nick Collison was POY.

Either way you in.

by Evan Pfaff on Dec 14, 2009 11:42 AM CST up reply actions  

Next: Length of Stay

It was tough to figure out how to rank players based on their length of stay. Should Durant and Beasley be penalized because they played one year? They were both national players of the year. Blake played two years, again national player of the year.

This aint the 70s, so we need to look at body of work for something like this, and sometimes the years played differ. I went on accolades, production and gut instinct when making the list.

Do you think Melo wouldn’t make a Big East all decade list? Hell, there are some who are saying he was the greatest college hoops player of all time… he only played one year.

(I guess replies go up top, so this should be First: Length of stay and the one below, Next: Tinsley Hinrich)

by Evan Pfaff on Dec 14, 2009 11:46 AM CST up reply actions  

... and apparently not

Replies do go below. you may now continue doing what you were doing before I made you dumber.

by Evan Pfaff on Dec 14, 2009 11:47 AM CST up reply actions  

nba or college???

It seems like this was written by an NBA fan rather than a college hoops fan. I wouldn’t comprise my list based on individual skill sets or “per game” statistics. Mine would be based on career stats and overall impact on Big 12 basketball. The guys that stick out in my head were the guys that killed your team every year and you couldn’t wait till they graduated. It seemed like they were in school for 6-7 years. Guys like Hollis Price, Kirk Hinrich, Acie Law and Arthur Johnson are the ones that truly shaped this decade in the Big 12. The fact that this list comes from the same guy that thinks Missouri should move to the Big 10 doesn’t surprise me at all.

by dgalkin on Dec 14, 2009 3:03 PM CST reply actions  

I think a lot of this goes back to the one-and-done vs 4 year guy. I couldn’t wait for Hollis Price to get out of Oklahoma, but think about how much damage Durant would have done by his senior year? Or Beasley? Or Blake? Who wins a place on your team, the best player int eh country for a year, or the biggest pest in the conference for 3-4 years?

The question, in this day and age, is whether an all Decade team should be made of up the best players or of those that put up the best stats in college.

As for the NBA take, the first team is made up of 2 guys who haven’t played an NBA game. And actually looking over the list, Durant would be the only NBA superstar.

by Evan Pfaff on Dec 14, 2009 3:12 PM CST up reply actions  

When I said...

“or of those that put up the best stats in college.” I meant career stats. A guy who played more years will undoubtedly score more points etc

by Evan Pfaff on Dec 14, 2009 3:16 PM CST up reply actions  

that reasoning is asinine

“how much damage Durant would have done by his senior year?” I don’t know…and neither do you. Maybe Durant blows out his knee like so many other players. Maybe he develops a bad attitude or work habits because he is the best player on his team and never challenged. There are so many what-ifs that it’s ridiculous to use that reasoning to justify your picks. Durant was incredible in his one year, but Marcus Fizer was equally dominant for 3 years.

Fizer’s accomplishments include All-Big 12 honorable mention (freshman), National first-team All-Freshman, first team All-Big 12 (sophomore and junior), Big 12 Player of the Year (junior), Big 12 Tournament Most Outstanding Player (junior), and consensus first-team All-America (junior). Additionally, he lead the Big 12 in scoring his sophomore and junior seasons. Lastly in his Junior year he led Iowa State to a a Big 12 regular season title,4 Big 12 tournament title, and Elite Eight NCAA Tournament finish.

by drussell420 on Dec 14, 2009 3:40 PM CST up reply actions  

agreed. let’s put me on the list because if i was a foot and a half taller and could jump higher, i would have done some damage too!
also, comparing Durant to Carmelo is ridiculous as well. One carried his team to an NCAA championship and the other (with arguably a better supporting cast) got bounced in the second round. Texas didn’t even win the Big 12 tounament that year. The guy never won a big game in his college (so called) “career”

by dgalkin on Dec 14, 2009 3:49 PM CST up reply actions  

Durant vs Fizer

Did Fizer help ISU more than Durant helped UT? By playing more years he most certainly did. No question.
If I were to choose one forward to play on my All Big 12 team, it would be Durant.

Remember, Durant was Big 12 and National Player of the Year. Fizer was neither. that means that according to the media there was somebody better in the conference (his teammate Tinsley) than Fizer. Durnat was the best player int he country.

by Evan Pfaff on Dec 14, 2009 3:54 PM CST up reply actions  

I was wrong, Fizer was Big 12 POY in 99-00. TInsley was in 00-01.

by Evan Pfaff on Dec 14, 2009 4:13 PM CST up reply actions  

I was surprised Chauncey Billups didn’t make the list. If I remember correctly, he only played a couple years at Colorado, but I remember being very happy when he went to the NBA Draft.

Now that I think about it, his last year was probably his only in the Big 12 (and not the Big 8)…and, of course, there’s a ton of talent at PG to choose from.

by CoreyTateDecker on Dec 14, 2009 3:27 PM CST up reply actions  

His first season in the NBA was the 97-98

so unfortunetly he is not considered.

Introducing the new 2008 Big 12 Football Champions: OU, UT*, TT*, and MU*!
Now Introducing the new 2009 Big 12 Baseball Tournament Champions: UT, KSU*, BU*, and MU*!

by mystman995 on Dec 14, 2009 3:55 PM CST up reply actions  

looking for...

john lucas (baylor/osu) and tony allen (osu). both were big12 player of the year in 2004 by various outlets.

by q-tip on Dec 14, 2009 5:03 PM CST reply actions  

Tony Allen's 1st team

Introducing the new 2008 Big 12 Football Champions: OU, UT*, TT*, and MU*!
Now Introducing the new 2009 Big 12 Baseball Tournament Champions: UT, KSU*, BU*, and MU*!

by mystman995 on Dec 14, 2009 5:22 PM CST up reply actions  

Lucas was good

Not better than Tinsley, Hinrich or Ford, in my opinion.

by Evan Pfaff on Dec 14, 2009 5:59 PM CST up reply actions  

Guards

Tinsley and Allen were fine players, but not the best IMHO. And as a Longhorn, I’d take Damion James or LaMarcus Aldridge over PJ Tucker.

Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.

by Caradoc on Dec 15, 2009 12:48 AM CST reply actions  

Durant one of the best period

Anybody who watched Kevin Durant play in college knows that he was one of the best the college game has seen in the last 20 years. He was a man amongst boys. His skill set was just too good. He may scoring 30 look easy. I’m an OU fan and he is absolutely the best player to ever play in the Big 12 and it isn’t even close. He made scoring look so easy. If he came back for his sophmore year I have no doubt in my mind that Texas goes undefeated and wins every game by 20 with the exception of the championship game against Memphis. Head and shoulders above everybody else. Durant will be the guy that will turn Texas into the North Carolina of the South/Southwest. He will do what Jordan did to North Carolina.

What exactly is your logic and rational for this list? For some players stats and team accomplishments matter and for others they don’t. Some players are put on their for their talent and skill while others are for their awards and accolades. Why exactly is Cole Aldrich on the first team? How is Antoine Wright not the honorable mention? How is Josh Carter not on the honorable mention? How does AJ Abrams not make it on one of the teams? A really poor list dude.

TJ Ford and DJ Augustin should be higher up. Tucker shouldn’t be on there and Gooden should be 2nd team.
Cole Aldrich and Tony Allen are first team All Decade? Really?

There was a firefight!!!!

by ThePhenomenon on Dec 15, 2009 3:25 AM CST reply actions  

A few things

that I’ll respond to, despite it not being my list. The Honorable Mentions are done fairly systematically, as you can see by 2-per team with a few exceptions. The teams that justified having multiple entries had them and I think personal bias took over when he slotted in 4 people for Missouri.

I really think you’re splitting hairs with Fizer and Gooden. Maybe the author feels more strongly about one than the other, but looking at their careers, I definitely think they’re interchangable.

Slotting Ford and Augustin up would require moving either Hinrich or Tinsley down. I don’t see how the hell you could justify the two Longhorn PGs ahead of either of the other two. T.J. played at a frenetic pace and really pushed the Longhorns but he was nowhere near the complete package that both Tinsley and Hinrich became.

As for Cole Aldrich making the first team….where exactly would you have put him? Going by a strict positional basis, there weren’t very many true centers in the running the last 10 years and as I noted below, I think Mihm ahead of Collison is wrong. Aldrich might not have done a whole lot in his freshman season but his pimp-handing of Hansbrough in the Final Four played a huge, huge role in that game. His season last year was nothing short of dominant defensively and if you watched a couple KU games you’d know that his points would’ve been higher if they actually ran some set plays for the guy. He’s a complete basketball player and a true center. The triple-double he had last year against Dayton in the tourney was unbelievable. In my opinion, he’s as much a runaway on the 1st Team All-Decade as Durant was (though if you were going G/G/F/F/F it would absolutely be Beasley in the 5th spot).

A little rudeness and disrespect can elevate a meaningless interaction to a battle of wills and add drama to an otherwise dull day.

by A.J. Haefele on Dec 15, 2009 5:24 AM CST up reply actions  

TJ won the Wooden & Naismith Award

Nationall, he was the best PLAYER, not the best PG. Hinrich and Tinsley couldn’t say that. TJ should be a first teamer.

By the way, the only Big 12 players to win a Naismith or Wooden this decade are TJ, Durant and Griffin (and each of them won both). Those three guys should all be first team for the decade, it’s like leaving a Heisman winner off the All Big 12 decade team. that’;s nuts.

by the1austin on Dec 15, 2009 4:32 PM CST up reply actions  

How did he not win Big 12 POY that year? Collison did?

I see you are right, but the list I used listed all the Big 12 POYs and noted which of those won the Naismith also. I honestly didnt look at the Naismith winners, thinking that if they didnt win the Big 12 POY they wouldn’t have been national POY.

Seems wierd to me, to win a national award, but not your conference award.

by Evan Pfaff on Dec 15, 2009 9:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Wow

I’m really surprised at how much hell you’ve gotten over the list. Trying to compile lists of the best teams over the last 10 years isn’t an easy thing but apparently picking them apart piece-by-piece is.

Personally, I like the lists and think they’re solid. Chris Mihm ahead of Nick Collison is the only complain I have and I admit that might be due to homerism on my part.

Is Brackins a PF or SF? If he’s a PF, I understand him being Honorable Mention but if he’s a SF, being behind P.J. Tucker will make me sad.

A little rudeness and disrespect can elevate a meaningless interaction to a battle of wills and add drama to an otherwise dull day.

by A.J. Haefele on Dec 15, 2009 5:08 AM CST reply actions  

Brackins vs Tucker

A lot of this was based on Big 12 POY. Tucker was Big 12 POY and 2nd team All American his Jr. year. That catapults him ahead of Brackins.

by Evan Pfaff on Dec 15, 2009 8:12 AM CST up reply actions  

If that's the case

you should also consider competition. I don’t think P.J. Tucker had to go against Michael Beasley or Blake Griffin for Big 12 POY honors. While Tucker did indeed win it, I don’t necessarily think it should be held against Brackins that SOMEONE had to win it in 05-06 and Tucker played against a much weaker Big 12 than Brackins has played in.

A little rudeness and disrespect can elevate a meaningless interaction to a battle of wills and add drama to an otherwise dull day.

by A.J. Haefele on Dec 15, 2009 9:30 AM CST up reply actions  

valid

Who would be on your first, second an/or third teams?

by Evan Pfaff on Dec 15, 2009 10:47 AM CST up reply actions  

Like I said above

I like your lists. I think they’re right about where I’d put mine and my only issues were Collison behind Mihm (again, that’s likely due to my KU bias) and Brackins over Tucker. Basically, my only changes would be to second and third team centers and a third team forward.

A little rudeness and disrespect can elevate a meaningless interaction to a battle of wills and add drama to an otherwise dull day.

by A.J. Haefele on Dec 15, 2009 11:50 AM CST up reply actions  

Only one team from the Big 12 won NC

this decade. Yet there’s nobody from that team on these lists (Cole as warming the bench that year) These lists cannot be taken seriously without anybody from the 08 KU team. HELLO, WE PLAY TO WIN THE GAME :)

by thales77 on Dec 16, 2009 6:19 PM CST reply actions  

Who from the 08 KU team..

would make it? I’ll give you BRush, but nobody else is really deserving. Chalmers was good, but not an all-decade guy. Cole is on my list. COllins played, but i dont think he is better than TInsley/TJ/Hinrich etc.

Here’s the roster: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007-08_Kansas_Jayhawks_men%27s_basketball_team#Roster

by Evan Pfaff on Dec 16, 2009 7:30 PM CST up reply actions  

rush or chalmers

would be as deserving as Tony Allen (why is he really there?) , Why wouldnt Collins be as deserving all the guys you mentioned? I’d take him over all of them. There’s something to be said about making clutch plays at the biggest stage at the most important times.

Look, by definition these lists are subjective, that’s why you should consider winning as factor. Nobody from the big 12 won as much as that 08 team. You must have one guy from that team on there.

by thales77 on Dec 16, 2009 9:44 PM CST up reply actions  

Allen was EASILY a better career player than Rush or Chalmers. It's not even close.

Those guys were good players who pretty much UNDERachieved . . . right up until their whole TEAM won the NC. That was a great OVERachieving team, at the end, but don’t let your HOMERism cloud your thoughts. Clutch plays are the only criterion? Well, let’s just put Acie Law on the first team then. There’s obviously more to look at than buzzer-beaters. Also, Aldrich has been a good post but not better than Mihm, Collison, or even Lamarcus Aldridge. He’s still got a little room to get better but he’s not quite there yet. Case in point, Damion James will probably win Big XII POY award this year – not Aldrich.

The list was the BEST Big XII players of the decade – not the best stay-for-3-year-or-more players. This is the best individual performers ever – not the biggest winners or best players on the NC team or best in the clutch, etc…

The first three teams are excellent and well thought out. My only changes would be to have DJ Augustin and Hollis Price (bump down Emmett) somewhere on the first 3 teams. The other PGs are just as deserving, though. Tinsley is deserving of recognition but I would have put Ford and Hinrich 1A & 1B and Augustin & Tinsley 2A & 2B. And after this year is over, you can replace Gooden w/ James on the 3rd team. Leading career rebounder in conference history, by far.

by robthecob on Feb 15, 2010 6:03 PM CST up reply actions  

ARE YOU DRUNK?

First of all the list should start with Durant or Beaz(it’s an argument who was better), then griffen, and then who ever. But I do know Cole is not on that list. Not even the second team. I know Kansas has been the best basketball team in the big 12 since it’s creation, but Cole isn’t even the best KU basketball player in the last decade. Whats he average 12 pts 9 boards, WOW! If your not averaging over 20 a game, it beter be a double double at least to make the list. This list is a joke.
Pat Pfeifley

by P-FLY on Dec 18, 2009 4:04 PM CST reply actions  


User Tools

Big12Hoops.com is the only blog on the web dedicated solely to Big XII basketball.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Watch Baylor Vs Bethune-Cookman Live Stream Online, Basketball 14-Dec-2011
Steeler_small
Predicting Big 12 Finish
Small
One special Missouri team

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Big12-xl_small Evan Pfaff

Editors

100_0778_1_small Joe Loyd

113311_rockets_media_day_basketball__1__small Nathan Kotisso

Small E. Carnes

Authors

Small Matt Patton

Capo_small Anthony Capobianco